Free OFAC search
Screen a person, company, vessel or aircraft against the OFAC SDN and Consolidated lists. Every candidate comes with the reason it matched and the list version it was checked against.
Potential match
5 listed parties scored at or above 0.75 against “JANG GYONG”. Review each reason below before deciding.
Lists checked
| List | Result | Published | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDN list | Potential match213 listed parties scored | publisher date of issue | adb6f31fe894last checked 2026-10-09 11:45 UTC |
| Consolidated (non-SDN) list | No match17 listed parties scored | publisher date of issue | c8b23340119dlast checked 2026-10-09 11:45 UTC |
Candidates to review
- JANG GYONG1.000 likely
SDN list entry 23159, vessel, DPRK4
Matched on the primary name
JANG GYONG
- name "JANG GYONG" matched the primary name "JANG GYONG" at 1: jang, gyong
- WANG Guoying0.873 review
SDN list entry 16819, individual, SDNTK
Matched on the primary name
WANG Guoying
- name "JANG GYONG" matched the primary name "WANG Guoying" at 0.873: gyong~guoying (skeleton, credit 0.9), jang~wang (phonetic, credit 0.85)
- Chang Kyong-hwa0.787 review
SDN list entry 20576, individual, DPRK2
Matched on A.K.A.
Jang Kyong Hwa
- name "JANG GYONG" matched the A.K.A. strong alias "Jang Kyong Hwa" at 0.787: jang, gyong~kyong (phonetic, credit 0.85); listed tokens not in query: hwa
- Hap Jang Gang 60.764 review
SDN list entry 23728, vessel, DPRK4
Matched on the primary name
Hap Jang Gang 6
- name "JANG GYONG" matched the primary name "Hap Jang Gang 6" at 0.764: jang, gyong~gang (skeleton, credit 0.9); listed tokens not in query: hap, 6
- Jong Kyong Thaek0.755 review
SDN list entry 23212, individual, DPRK2
Matched on the primary name
Jong Kyong Thaek
- name "JANG GYONG" matched the primary name "Jong Kyong Thaek" at 0.755: jang~jong (skeleton, credit 0.9), gyong~kyong (phonetic, credit 0.85); listed tokens not in query: thaek
Matcher m1.n1. Screened 2026-10-09 11:53 UTC. Thresholds: review at 0.75, likely at 0.9. Candidates are possible matches to review, not determinations. Not legal advice.